Is Big Tech Too Big? – BBC Click technology bbc

by Trần Hào



We ask what will President Joe Biden mean for the future of social media? We speak to a number of key insiders who are helping to shape policy around this issue.

We also speak to Facebook’s oversight board on concerns for free speech and talk with Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales on what Wikipedia has to teach others in terms of the handling culture wars online

See also  iTero Element 5D: das erste integrierte dentale Bildgebungssystem mit NIRI Technology 5 d technology

SUBSCRIBE HERE:
FIND US ONLINE:
TWITTER:
FACEBOOK:
INSTAGRAM: .

Images related to the topic technology bbc

Is Big Tech Too Big? - BBC Click

Is Big Tech Too Big? – BBC Click

Search related to the topic Is Big Tech Too Big? – BBC Click

#Big #Tech #Big #BBC #Click
Is Big Tech Too Big? – BBC Click
technology bbc
See all the latest ways to make money online: see more here
See all the latest ways to make money online: see more here

See also  Birthday Sale - Technology technology advertisement

Related Posts

48 comments

Kousaburo 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

BBC have no right to be against fake news.

Reply
Perspective 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Don't think these social media platform owners should be held responsible for what other people say or publish on their platforms, but do think they should stop locking our accounts for frivolous reasons so they can demand our phone numbers.

Reply
Perspective 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

7,000 + complaints on bbb (better business bureau) with a rating of F for twitter
Most of the complaints are about accounts being locked.

Reply
Perspective 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

What I'd like to know is why does twitter say its a private company when people complain but wikipedia says its a public company and in twitters privacy policy one of the first things they say is Twitter is public.
They are locking peoples accounts for nothing and saying its because people broke their TOS rules, they don't specify which rule, and they demand PII (Personally identifiable information) like the phone number to unlock it.
But they aren't the only ones who is locking accounts and demanding PII to open it.
When you file an appeal to unlock your twitter account on the form to fill out it says phone number (optional)
In twitters Privacy Policy it says you can share other information if you CHOOSE, and one of them is the phone number.
But then they lock you out and try to force you to give them that information.

Reply
Raw Chicken Sandwich 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Joe Biden loves big tech

Reply
Monstah Jones 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

And the insanity continues.. There seems to be a failure to recognize the obvious these days.. Big Tech, starts out as small tech and cares not for its users and/or their beliefs (nor should it), only for gaining more users or generating more sales, i would have thought this to be obvious, but this discussion tells me that it's not.. Blaming the platform for the mental illness of others is a big swing and a miss, i wont presume to have the answer, but would've hoped for a lil more rational thought and lil less blame game that seems to the societal norm these days..

Reply
kevin kirkby 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Big tech is like the BBC.. in need of being broken up..

Reply
Fade2k 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

8 mins into this and so far it looks like the BBC as usual are pushing for censorship of anyone not towing the MSM narrative, notice how they say over and over "Conspiracy Theories".
Section 230 would be fine if it wasn't for big tech censoring one side and pushing the other, this makes them publisher's not hosters. #defundBBC

Reply
Gary Child 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

this is biased crap, typical BBC

Reply
Aml Ali 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Hi
I enjoy your videos alot
I hope to help you increasing your viewerships. This by subtitle your videos to Arabic and sharing it in many groups for Arab. I have Bachelor's degree in English literature. Don't worry about the charge. I will just charge 5$/2 minutes
Check the opinion of the last youtuber I dealt with :
"Thank you for the translation. It really had a great effect, I gained a lot of exposure from it"

Reply
Anshul Sharma 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

The worse thing about the algorithm that social media company use is the ambiguity in it , Facebook Google Twitter don't exactly know how machine learning works under the hood.

Reply
David Rooke 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Breaking up big tech for simply allowing people to express their views is censorship, what's next censoring Christian churches for peddling fake beliefs?

Reply
Ng Wai Lung 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Yes

Reply
John Johansson 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Anything not left leaning is "conspiracy theories".. Is that a democracy?

Reply
j l 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

230 Is great, just needs to be enforced.

Dems want to remove it bc they want more censorship but also want control over the tech companies. They let big tech continue to silence one side while allowing the others to roam free, only moving to the punishment of the platforms if big tech censors the wrong ppl.

This is also, a way to ensure companies such as parler do not even have a chance as they will be deemed as a "domestic terrorist" which is one if not the most ambiguous definitions used by this party and administration.

Reply
Lasse Thomsen 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

nice info on Wikipedia 🙂

Reply
Vinylnuts 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

More Joe Biden propaganda nothing to do with democracy thanks BBC.

Reply
hannesRSA 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

The internet is great. Why ruin that? Seems that the only reason is that governments are scared of freedom of speech.

Reply
VR Wizard 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

23:45 Don't miss the all mighty Bernie Sanders.

Reply
TheTruthinAstronomy 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Big Tech have censorship down to a fine art. They won't allow you to discuss certain politics even certain things about Covid but for years they have allowed people to brag on their platforms about force feeding their children industrial bleach to cure Autism, they've allowed people to state they would like to blow passenger planes out of the sky to stop "chem-trailing". I think they are pretty hypocritical.

Facebook and the like send links to a lot of the stuff they claim to ban. I get "recommended for you" all the time and some of it is crazy stuff.

Reply
MrKnocik 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

If 230 is removed that is where FB and others will start censorship big time in the name of self protection.
In Poland, gov is preparing a law that if any social media will delete post, vid or any content can be reported and if not restored will be fined. Only 1 exception there, if content is against the polish law it can be removed and that is the only reason when it can be deleted.

Reply
Black Tiger 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Fakebook is Fakebook. 99.9999999999% of "information" in "social networks" is just fakes, ads and cats.
But humans are stupid. It seems we have a not-to-be-spoken brain decease which affects human brains. Some some of neuro virus.

Reply
Colin Campbell 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Who will bet that BBC Click go on to repeat parts of this show again? Like they seems to do these days.

Reply
Jay James 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

the internet is like the biggest propaganda machine ever invented. Lol.

Reply
Alien 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

I've cancelled my #AmazonPrime renewal and also #GoogleDrive, I'm done with supporting #BigTech and others need to wake up to the fact that the media hasn't our best interests on its agenda.
The Pursuit of Profit #Veiws,…above all else is on their agenda.

Reply
Matt Rose 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Big tech definitely is far too big. They're almost as powerful as actual Governments to be honest, which is a very bad thing!

Reply
Tristan Goddard 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Very true, the fight is between freedom of speech and misinformation, where do you draw the line? For instance if someone states that they believe the election was rigged, give some “facts” as they believe them to be and it gets shared, now is that freedom of speech or fake news/misinformation?
I think the pressure needs to be on the big tech companies as much as the sources of the information, which I do feel like the tech companies are trying very hard to monitor and maintain. And I think the wider population needs to chip in and report posts with articles containing and propagating false information, My mother in law believes EVERYTHING she sees on Facebook and shares it, I’m not ashamed to say I am the reason she has had her account suspended because I’ve reported her for sharing fake COVID news stories, and I’ve told her I was one of the people who reports her, as well as trying to show her how to tell an article is fake.

Reply
Corey Chambers 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

BBC is fake news manufactured to prop up the crown, to stifle dissent.

Reply
OttoT 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Let me see…Hitler…no social media or big tech…why did people give that idiot power?

Reply
unixb4coffee 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

ISTM that there's a difference between what places like Wikipedia (or BBC) perceive as its "product." I can cite many instances where users haven't made the distinction between original information, or an extended conversation that simply uses new, more effective tech – very willingly placing themselves in role of being intelligent consumers of information. Though everyone has his opinion, and it's easy to criticize, this aspect of media is nothing new. I have personal experience with this, FWIW, when this market evolved, and I simply dropped the word, "press," from, "computer trade press," when describing my job. The "MSM" needs to adapt to the tech or be left behind. The tech is not a substitute for "quality" of information.

Reply
Bradikal 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

How dare you say that 1 side almost broke democracy, they have a right to express themselves as well or don't you understand that? You think the left burning cities was perfectly fine protests but some people greycon into the capital one building over another was not? You think 1/2 of a nation feeling betrayed by its government is OK? This is the worst hit piece from BBC click I have ever seen and I don't know if I'm gonna continue watching your stuff. That's fine if you want to talk about big Tech but don't talk about half the American public as if there terrorists or insurgents trying to overthrow a government. Keep to the reviews on technology and the like and leave the politics out please.

Reply
Paul 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

The MSM and social media are the enemy.

Reply
Anantha srikara 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Of course big tech like google, Facebook, and Twitter can not be blamed. They are just platforms which the people use to share information. They should implement stricter restrictions on what is being shared on their platform even though it costs the privacy of the user. They have to Implement these changes to avoid misinformation getting circulated on their platforms.

Reply
Jameel Ja 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Removing section 230 is a double edged sword.

Reply
SABO FX 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Great piece on Wikipedia. Like WikiLeaks, one of the best websites on the interwebs! Thanx 👌

Reply
Jeremy Travis 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

I love this programme. I think that Tech Companies should take responsibility, especially Facebook. 
If you get scammed by advertising on Facebook and you loose a lot of money the company that hosts the advert should compensate you.

Reply
Tim Collins 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Finally, leave Jimmy alone. Support him he has and should be allowed to continue to deliver a great service to us all.

Reply
Tim Collins 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Facebook and Twitter et al do not need breaking up. They should contain a public warning that they common publishers and are not the originators of content. “I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend your right to say it, to the death”. Patrick Henry

Reply
Andrew 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Biden is very likely to start new wars and let his generals hide from the public limelight; unlike Trump.

Reply
Tim Collins 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Residual trumpists will try to lionise Ashli Babbitt for their "cause". We should be showing compassion for her family, and leave it there. RIP Ashli.

Reply
Elias Roth 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

What was that at the end?

Reply
Andrew 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Biden was interfering in Ukraine and his son was making money there through bullying… The term economic hitman comes mind.

Reply
Andrew 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Is it still a conspiracy theory that Oswald was not a deranged lone assassin and that the government was involved in the assassination of jfk? What about khashoggi? In a capitalistic society the oligarchical billionaires can buy the "narrative"("truth").

Reply
Brian Mosley 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Power struggles

Reply
Robert Shipley 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Its been scary here in the USA. People are getting tired of our government in their crystal palaces. Americans cant afford to live

Reply
Mike theJedi 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Love the diversity it really adds to your content

-no-one

Reply
J K 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

Next: Is The BBC Too Big?!?! 🤔🤨🧐

Reply
TiNy LiLmaN 15/10/2021 - 1:45 AM

First

Reply

Leave a Comment